Finding the spot is easy depending on which spot we are
looking for. That is, finding the
general area is easy. Suppose we want to
fish at the lighthouse or at eagle wing or at picton. That is easy to do, in a commonplace
sense. In a precision sense, fishing at
the lighthouse or at eagle wing or at picton is very open to interpretation or
as jessy larkins says, “interpertation”.
For instance, the lighthouse can be seen from far away. Plus it is on an island. If the lighthouse is in view, does it count
as fishing at the lighthouse? Again,
what side of the island counts as fishing at the lighthouse? Depending on who you ask, the interpretation could
be varied. I will say that only the
channel side of the lighthouse and down to 213 and as far out as the middle of
the channel (but why would you be fishing in the middle of the channel?) can be
construed as ‘fishing at the lighthouse.’
The other side of the island, the fishers landing side, would be fishing the foxy’s run, strangely enough,
even though its much closer to the lighthouse than foxy’s. This is also more close to isle of pines,
but no one says they are fishing at isle of pines.
But suppose we can pinpoint an exact location on the surface
of the river. Getting in that spot and
staying there is more difficult. Due to
strong currents and winds, it is hard to stay in a spot. Finding the spot is obfuscated by the homogeneity
of the surface of the water. Then to
find the spot, a spot, one spot, we tend to define it by the landscape on the
bottom of the river. Empty the river of
water and you will see a very interesting geology. Some places are large flats of mud and shells
with the crazy erratic thrown out. Very deep places, I have heard, are barren
moonlike landscapes where jagged or smooth granite rocks are covered in a thick
layer of huge zebra mussels. The
topography is endless and variable. In a
relatively short distance the water can drop from 10 feet deep to 80 feet
deep. Such features, peaks, valleys,
boulders, holes, swells, flats, weeds, are interesting to the fish and
consequently to the fisherman.
Sometimes we know there are certain features in a certain
area and we want to find them again and fish them again. The best way is to actually look. The water in the river is clear and thirty
feet down is about how far you can see.
If you get into the water the visible range extends for a little
farther. I myself keep a pair of goggles in the boat for just this
purpose. At the most simple remedy, the
goggles go on and you stick your head in neck deep over the gunwales and take a
look. In deeper water or unswimmable
times, the fisherman has modern technology at the ready. This includes a combination of sonar and satellite
guided navigation instruments. The
interpretation of the former and the accuracy of the latter are up for
debate. Instrument based navigation has
its time and place but should not be relied upon solely. The best guide is experience, patience, and
good luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment